The GBS code for the self-consistent simulation of plasma turbulence and kinetic neutral dynamics in the tokamak boundary
M. Giacomin, P. Ricci, A. Coroado, G. Fourestey, D. Galassi, E. Lanti,, D. Mancini, N. Richart, L. N. Stenger, N. Varini

TL;DR
The paper introduces an enhanced GBS simulation code that models plasma turbulence and neutral dynamics in the entire tokamak volume with flexible magnetic configurations, improved computational efficiency, and validated results including a TCV discharge simulation.
Contribution
The new GBS version extends the simulation domain, incorporates flexible magnetic configurations, implements a faster iterative solver, and enhances parallelization for better performance.
Findings
Extended simulation domain to include core-edge-SOL interplay.
Achieved significant speed-up with iterative solvers over direct methods.
Successfully simulated a TCV tokamak discharge.
Abstract
A new version of GBS (Ricci et al. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54, 124047, 2012; Halpern et al. J. Comput. Phys. 315, 388-408, 2016; Paruta et al. Phys. Plasmas 25, 112301, 2018) is described. GBS is a three-dimensional, flux-driven, global, two-fluid turbulence code developed for the self-consistent simulation of plasma turbulence and kinetic neutral dynamics in the tokamak boundary. In the new version presented here, the simulation domain is extended to encompass the whole plasma volume, avoiding an artificial boundary with the core, hence retaining the core-edge-SOL interplay. A new toroidal coordinate system is introduced to increase the code flexibility, allowing for the simulation of arbitrary magnetic configurations (e.g. single-null, double-null and snowflake configurations), which can also be the result of the equilibrium reconstruction of an experimental discharge. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
