TL;DR
This paper empirically evaluates various probabilistic deep learning methods for air quality forecasting, emphasizing the importance of uncertainty quantification in making informed decisions and proposing enhancements like adversarial training.
Contribution
It provides an extensive empirical comparison of state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification techniques in air quality prediction and introduces improvements leveraging data correlations.
Findings
Bayesian neural networks offer more reliable uncertainty estimates but are complex to implement.
Deep ensemble, MC dropout, and SWAG perform well with tradeoffs in accuracy and scalability.
Uncertainty-aware models improve decision-making in air quality management.
Abstract
Data-driven forecasts of air quality have recently achieved more accurate short-term predictions. Despite their success, most of the current data-driven solutions lack proper quantifications of model uncertainty that communicate how much to trust the forecasts. Recently, several practical tools to estimate uncertainty have been developed in probabilistic deep learning. However, there have not been empirical applications and extensive comparisons of these tools in the domain of air quality forecasts. Therefore, this work applies state-of-the-art techniques of uncertainty quantification in a real-world setting of air quality forecasts. Through extensive experiments, we describe training probabilistic models and evaluate their predictive uncertainties based on empirical performance, reliability of confidence estimate, and practical applicability. We also propose improving these models…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
