Birational classification for algebraic tori
Akinari Hoshi, Aiichi Yamasaki

TL;DR
This paper classifies algebraic tori of dimensions 3 and 4 up to stable birational equivalence, introduces computational methods for invariants, and establishes criteria for stable birationality and rationality using cohomological and p-adic techniques.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification of algebraic tori in low dimensions, introduces effective computational procedures for invariants, and establishes new criteria for stable birational equivalence.
Findings
13 classes of non-stably rational tori in dimension 3
128 classes of non-stably rational tori in dimension 4
Criteria for stable birational equivalence based on splitting fields and invariants
Abstract
We give a stably birational classification for algebraic tori of dimensions and over a field . First, we define the weak stably equivalence of algebraic tori and show that there exist (resp. ) weak stably equivalent classes of algebraic tori of dimension (resp. ) which are not stably rational by computing some cohomological stably birational invariants, e.g. the Brauer-Grothendieck group of where is a smooth compactification of , provided by Kunyavskii, Skorobogatov and Tsfasman. We make a procedure to compute such stably birational invariants effectively and the computations are done by using the computer algebra system GAP. Second, we define the -part of the flabby class as a -lattice and prove that they are faithful and indecomposable -lattices unless it vanishes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
