A Detection of Red Noise in PSR J1824$-$2452A and Projections for PSR B1937+21 using NICER X-ray Timing Data
Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Jack Crump, Andrea N. Lommen, Sergio, Montano, Samantha J. H. Berry, Jesse Zeldes, Elizabeth Teng, Paul, S. Ray, Matthew Kerr, Zaven Arzoumanian, Slavko Bogdanov, Julia, Deneva, Natalia Lewandowska, Craig B. Markwardt, Scott Ransom and, Teruaki Enoto

TL;DR
This study uses NICER X-ray data to detect red noise in millisecond pulsars, demonstrating the potential for future X-ray missions to identify intrinsic pulsar noise and gravitational wave backgrounds with improved timing precision.
Contribution
The paper introduces a Bayesian method to detect red noise in X-ray pulsar data and projects the observational requirements for future missions to reliably identify such noise.
Findings
Red noise detected in PSR J1824-2452A with strong Bayesian evidence.
Future X-ray missions can detect red noise in PSR B1937+21 within 5 years with specified timing accuracy.
Injected gravitational wave background signals can be distinguished in long-term observations without red noise interference.
Abstract
We have used X-ray data from the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) to search for long time-scale, correlated variations ("red noise") in the pulse times of arrival from the millisecond pulsars PSR J18242452A and PSR B1937+21. These data more closely track intrinsic noise because X-rays are unaffected by the radio-frequency dependent propagation effects of the interstellar medium. Our Bayesian search methodology yields strong evidence (natural log Bayes factor of ) for red noise in PSR J18242452A, but is inconclusive for PSR B1937+21. In the interest of future X-ray missions, we devise and implement a method to simulate longer and higher precision X-ray datasets to determine the timing baseline necessary to detect red noise. We find that the red noise in PSR B1937+21 can be reliably detected in a 5-year mission with a time-of-arrival (TOA) error of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
