Can scalars matter? A vector bilepton phenomenologic example
Mario W. Barela

TL;DR
This paper challenges the common assumption that scalar contributions are less significant than vector ones in physical observables, demonstrating that scalars can lead to interesting phenomena under certain conditions.
Contribution
It provides a phenomenological example showing scalars can be as important as vectors, contrary to typical expectations, highlighting the need to reconsider their role in models.
Findings
Scalar contributions can be significant in certain parameter spaces.
Scalar effects may lead to novel phenomena not accounted for by vector dominance.
The study emphasizes the importance of not dismissing scalar contributions in phenomenological analyses.
Abstract
Expecting scalar contributions to be less important to a given observable signal than vector ones, in usual scenarios, is a natural intuition. Such assertion should hold for a great part of physically relevant parameter space within most models of interest. In this work, besides stressing that the proposition is not general, we show how the alternative possibility may give light to interesting phenomena.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
