Talking about responsible quantum: Awareness is the absolute minimum... that we need to do

TL;DR

This paper discusses the importance of early societal engagement in responsible quantum technology development, emphasizing the need for awareness and dialogue before the sector's trajectory becomes fixed.

Contribution

It highlights the Collingridge dilemma in responsible quantum development and advocates for stakeholder engagement to address uncertainties early.

Findings

Stakeholder perspectives are crucial for responsible quantum development.

Early engagement can shape societal impacts positively.

Current lack of real-world case studies hampers responsible development efforts.

Abstract

Hype over novel quantum technologies has prompted discussion on the likely societal impacts of the sector. Calls to ensure the responsible development of quantum technologies are complicated by a lack of concrete case studies or real-world examples of irresponsible quantum. At this stage, responsible quantum faces a situation reminiscent of the Collingridge dilemma. In this dilemma, the moment in which discussion on societal risks and benefits can be most impactful is also the time where the least information is available. The flipside of this challenge is an opportunity to build processes for examining the public good of quantum before the trajectory (and potential problems) of the sector become locked in. Recent work in this space has argued that quantum researchers and innovators must work with society to address uncertainties and concerns. By engaging quantum stakeholders and understanding their perspectives on responsibility, this paper seeks to support this proposition and enable further dialogue on responsible development and use of quantum technologies.