Australia's Approach to AI Governance in Security and Defence
Susannah Kate Devitt, Damian Copeland

TL;DR
Australia actively develops AI for security and defense, emphasizing ethical guidelines, legal compliance, and responsible innovation, aiming to lead in trustworthy AI governance within military and security sectors.
Contribution
The paper highlights Australia's comprehensive approach to AI governance in security and defense, including ethical frameworks, legal reviews, and a practical methodology for integrating risks into military AI acquisition.
Findings
Australia emphasizes ethical and legal AI use in defense.
Development of a practical framework for ethical AI in military applications.
Australia advocates for leadership in trustworthy AI governance.
Abstract
Australia is a leading AI nation with strong allies and partnerships. Australia has prioritised the development of robotics, AI, and autonomous systems to develop sovereign capability for the military. Australia commits to Article 36 reviews of all new means and methods of warfare to ensure weapons and weapons systems are operated within acceptable systems of control. Additionally, Australia has undergone significant reviews of the risks of AI to human rights and within intelligence organisations and has committed to producing ethics guidelines and frameworks in Security and Defence. Australia is committed to OECD's values-based principles for the responsible stewardship of trustworthy AI as well as adopting a set of National AI ethics principles. While Australia has not adopted an AI governance framework specifically for the Australian Defence Organisation (ADO); Defence Science and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
