Ab initio predictions link the neutron skin of ${}^{208}$Pb to nuclear forces
Baishan Hu, Weiguang Jiang, Takayuki Miyagi, Zhonghao Sun, Andreas, Ekstr\"om, Christian Forss\'en, Gaute Hagen, Jason D. Holt, Thomas, Papenbrock, S. Ragnar Stroberg, Ian Vernon

TL;DR
This paper uses advanced quantum many-body methods and statistical tools to predict the neutron skin thickness of ${}^{208}$Pb from fundamental nuclear forces, linking nuclear structure to neutron star properties.
Contribution
It introduces a novel combination of ab initio calculations, statistical analysis, and emulator technology to accurately predict properties of a heavy nucleus from first principles.
Findings
Predicted neutron skin thickness of ${}^{208}$Pb is smaller and more precise than previous measurements.
Demonstrated the role of realistic nuclear forces in heavy nuclei.
Established a link between nuclear forces and neutron star properties.
Abstract
Heavy atomic nuclei have an excess of neutrons over protons, which leads to the formation of a neutron skin whose thickness is sensitive to details of the nuclear force. This links atomic nuclei to properties of neutron stars, thereby relating objects that differ in size by orders of magnitude. The nucleus Pb is of particular interest because it exhibits a simple structure and is experimentally accessible. However, computing such a heavy nucleus has been out of reach for ab initio theory. By combining advances in quantum many-body methods, statistical tools, and emulator technology, we make quantitative predictions for the properties of Pb starting from nuclear forces that are consistent with symmetries of low-energy quantum chromodynamics. We explore different nuclear-force parameterisations via history matching, confront them with data in select light…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
