Undecidability in Finite Transducers, Defense Systems and Finite Substitutions
Vesa Halava

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining the equivalence of finite substitutions on a specific regular language is undecidable, building on previous foundational work in the field.
Contribution
It provides a detailed proof establishing the undecidability of finite substitution equivalence, extending prior theoretical results.
Findings
Proof of undecidability for finite substitution equivalence
Extension of Lisovik's work on related problems
Clarification of limits in automata and formal language decision procedures
Abstract
In this manuscript we present a detailed proof for undecidability of the equivalence of finite substitutions on regular language . The proof is based on the works of Leonid P. Lisovik.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Logic, programming, and type systems
