Emotions as abstract evaluation criteria in biological and artificial intelligences
Claudius Gros

TL;DR
The paper explores how emotions function as abstract evaluation criteria in biological and artificial intelligences, proposing a framework that mimics emotional evaluation to guide goal pursuit and decision-making.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework called time allocation via emotional stationarity (TAES) that models emotions as abstract criteria for evaluating activities in AI systems.
Findings
Emotions serve as essential value attribution mechanisms in intelligent agents.
The TAES framework enables AI to optimize task selection based on emotional state statistics.
The model aligns emotional experience with agent character through long-term optimization.
Abstract
Biological as well as advanced artificial intelligences (AIs) need to decide which goals to pursue. We review nature's solution to the time allocation problem, which is based on a continuously readjusted categorical weighting mechanism we experience introspectively as emotions. One observes phylogenetically that the available number of emotional states increases hand in hand with the cognitive capabilities of animals and that raising levels of intelligence entail ever larger sets of behavioral options. Our ability to experience a multitude of potentially conflicting feelings is in this view not a leftover of a more primitive heritage, but a generic mechanism for attributing values to behavioral options that can not be specified at birth. In this view, emotions are essential for understanding the mind. For concreteness, we propose and discuss a framework which mimics emotions on a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Language and cultural evolution · Cognitive Science and Education Research
