Extending the FIP bias sample to magnetically active stars. Challenging the FIP bias paradigm?
B. Seli, K. Ol\'ah, L. Kriskovics, Zs. K\H{o}v\'ari, K. Vida, L. G., Bal\'azs, J. M. Laming, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi, D. Baker

TL;DR
This study extends the understanding of the FIP bias in stellar coronae by analyzing a larger sample including evolved stars, revealing new structures and correlations with stellar activity and internal properties.
Contribution
It introduces an expanded FIP bias sample with evolved stars and identifies new features and clusters in the FIP bias versus stellar parameters.
Findings
Discovery of a second branch in the FIP bias versus temperature diagram.
Identification of three clusters related to stellar evolution and activity.
Correlation between FIP bias and stellar activity indicators such as X-ray flux and rotation.
Abstract
The different elemental abundances of the photosphere and the corona are striking features of not only the Sun, but other stars as well. This phenomenon is known as the FIP effect (FIP stands for first ionization potential), and its strength can be characterized by the FIP bias, the logarithmic abundance difference between low- and high-FIP elements in the corona, compared to the photosphere. The FIP bias was shown to depend on the surface temperature of the star. We compiled FIP bias and other parameters for 59 stars for which coronal composition is available, now including evolved stars. Using principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis, we searched for correlations with other astrophysical parameters within the sample which may influence the stellar FIP bias. Adding stars to the FIP bias diagram unveiled new features in its structure. In addition to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
