Waveforms and fluxes: Towards a self-consistent effective one body waveform model for nonprecessing, coalescing black-hole binaries for third generation detectors
Angelica Albertini, Alessandro Nagar, Piero Rettegno, Simone Albanesi,, and Rossella Gamba

TL;DR
This paper improves an Effective-One-Body waveform model for nonprecessing black-hole binaries by incorporating new corrections, resulting in higher self-consistency and better agreement with numerical relativity, crucial for future gravitational wave detectors.
Contribution
The paper introduces Next-to-Quasi-Circular corrections and updates the spin-orbital sector in the TEOBResumS model, enhancing its accuracy and consistency with numerical relativity simulations.
Findings
Maximum unfaithfulness between 10^{-4} and 10^{-3} for most configurations.
Performance degrades to about 5×10^{-3} with increasing effective spin.
Model shows reliable accuracy for third-generation gravitational wave detectors.
Abstract
We present a comprehensive comparison between numerical relativity (NR) angular momentum fluxes at infinity and the corresponding quantity entering the radiation reaction in TEOBResumS, an Effective-One-Body (EOB) waveform model for nonprecessing coalescing black hole binaries on quasi-circular orbits. This comparison prompted us to implement two changes in the model: (i) including Next-to-Quasi-Circular corrections in the , multipoles entering the radiation reaction and (ii) consequently updating the NR-informed spin-orbital sector of the model. This yields a new waveform model that presents a higher self-consistency between waveform and dynamics and an improved agreement with NR simulations. We test the model computing the EOB/NR unfaithfulness over all 534 spin-aligned configurations available through the Simulating eXtreme Spacetime…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
