Programmatic Innovations that Accord with the Retention of Women in STEM Careers
R. Balasubramanian (1,3), D. Findley-Van Nostrand (2), M. C. Fleenor, (1,4) ((1) Dept of Math, Comp. Sci. & Physics, Roanoke College, VA, (2) Dept, of Psychology, Roanoke College, VA, (3) Chance to Change Lives-US,, Pittsburgh, PA, (4) Dept of Chem & Physics, U Mary Washington

TL;DR
This study documents a multi-year, multi-faceted programmatic approach at a liberal arts physics program that significantly increased women's retention and graduation rates in STEM careers, demonstrating the effectiveness of combined strategies.
Contribution
It presents a detailed case study of innovative programmatic strategies that improved women’s retention and success in physics within a liberal arts setting, supporting national best practices.
Findings
200% increase in women degree recipients over ten years
Higher retention rates for women compared to men
Approximately 90% of women physics majors entered science careers within five years
Abstract
Gender representation in the physical sciences remains inequitable and continues to lag behind other fields. Even though there exists adequate documentation regarding programmatic postures and innovations, difficulties persist within the physics discipline. In this paper, we present innovative, programmatic implementations over an eight-year period at an undergraduate, liberal arts physics program. Some of these innovations accord with nationally-published, `best practices' for undergraduate physics programs, while others are novel to the program's context. Within this eight-year period, alterations are separated into curricular, co-curricular, and experiential elements. Innovations are introduced in some detail, and data are presented before, during, and after their introduction. While it is currently impossible to say which elements had the greatest impact, the synergistic combination…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCareer Development and Diversity
