BASS XXIX: The near-infrared view of the BLR: the effects of obscuration in BLR characterisation

TL;DR

This study investigates how obscuration affects the measurement of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei, emphasizing the importance of near-infrared observations for unbiased black hole mass estimation.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of near-infrared spectra from a large sample of AGN, demonstrating the biases introduced by obscuration and proposing more reliable methods for BLR and black hole mass measurements.

Findings

FWHMs of broad lines remain unbiased by obscuration.

Hα luminosity is suppressed at high obscuration, underestimating black hole mass.

Near-infrared line luminosities are more reliable than Hα at certain obscuration levels.

Abstract

Virial black hole mass ($M_{BH}$) determination directly involves knowing the broad line region (BLR) clouds velocity distribution, their distance from the central supermassive black hole ($R_{BLR}$) and the virial factor ($f$). Understanding whether biases arise in $M_{BH}$ estimation with increasing obscuration is possible only by studying a large (N$>$100) statistical sample of obscuration unbiased (hard) X-ray selected active galactic nuclei (AGN) in the rest-frame near-infrared (0.8-2.5$\mu$m) since it penetrates deeper into the BLR than the optical. We present a detailed analysis of 65 local BAT-selected Seyfert galaxies observed with Magellan/FIRE. Adding these to the near-infrared BAT AGN spectroscopic survey (BASS) database, we study a total of 314 unique near-infrared spectra. While the FWHMs of H$\alpha$ and near-infrared broad lines (He\textsc{i}, Pa$\beta$, Pa$\alpha$) remain unbiased to either BLR extinction or X-ray obscuration, the H$\alpha$ broad line luminosity is suppressed when $N_H\gtrsim10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, systematically underestimating $M_{BH}$ by $0.23-0.46$ dex. Near-infrared line luminosities should be preferred to H$\alpha$ until $N_H<10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, while at higher obscuration a less biased $R_{BLR}$ proxy should be adopted. We estimate $f$ for Seyfert 1 and 2 using two obscuration-unbiased $M_{BH}$ measurements, i.e. the stellar velocity dispersion and a BH mass prescription based on near-infrared and X-ray, and find that the virial factors do not depend on redshift or obscuration, but for some broad lines show a mild anti-correlation with $M_{BH}$. Our results show the critical impact obscuration can have on BLR characterization and the importance of the near-infrared and X-rays for a less biased view of the BLR.