A model of semantic completion in generative episodic memory

TL;DR

This paper introduces a computational model of generative episodic memory that uses semantic completion to fill in missing details, enabling plausible recall and generalization from incomplete memory traces.

Contribution

It presents a novel model combining VQ-VAE and PixelCNN to simulate how episodic memory reconstructs and generalizes, emphasizing semantic completion's role.

Findings

Model can plausibly complete missing memory parts.

Achieves strong generalization to unseen images.

Replicates key experimental findings on memory recall.

Abstract

Many different studies have suggested that episodic memory is a generative process, but most computational models adopt a storage view. In this work, we propose a computational model for generative episodic memory. It is based on the central hypothesis that the hippocampus stores and retrieves selected aspects of an episode as a memory trace, which is necessarily incomplete. At recall, the neocortex reasonably fills in the missing information based on general semantic information in a process we call semantic completion. As episodes we use images of digits (MNIST) augmented by different backgrounds representing context. Our model is based on a VQ-VAE which generates a compressed latent representation in form of an index matrix, which still has some spatial resolution. We assume that attention selects some part of the index matrix while others are discarded, this then represents the gist of the episode and is stored as a memory trace. At recall the missing parts are filled in by a PixelCNN, modeling semantic completion, and the completed index matrix is then decoded into a full image by the VQ-VAE. The model is able to complete missing parts of a memory trace in a semantically plausible way up to the point where it can generate plausible images from scratch. Due to the combinatorics in the index matrix, the model generalizes well to images not trained on. Compression as well as semantic completion contribute to a strong reduction in memory requirements and robustness to noise. Finally we also model an episodic memory experiment and can reproduce that semantically congruent contexts are always recalled better than incongruent ones, high attention levels improve memory accuracy in both cases, and contexts that are not remembered correctly are more often remembered semantically congruently than completely wrong.