Fluxonium: an alternative qubit platform for high-fidelity operations
Feng Bao, Hao Deng, Dawei Ding, Ran Gao, Xun Gao, Cupjin Huang, Xun, Jiang, Hsiang-Sheng Ku, Zhisheng Li, Xizheng Ma, Xiaotong Ni, Jin Qin, Zhijun, Song, Hantao Sun, Chengchun Tang, Tenghui Wang, Feng Wu, Tian Xia, Wenlong, Yu, Fang Zhang, Gengyan Zhang, Xiaohang Zhang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a fluxonium-based quantum processor with high coherence and gate fidelities, offering a promising alternative platform for fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computing.
Contribution
It introduces a fluxonium qubit system with fast, high-fidelity gates, showing competitive performance to transmon qubits for fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Findings
Single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.97%
Two-qubit gate fidelity of up to 99.72%
Achieved performance comparable to leading superconducting qubits
Abstract
Superconducting qubits provide a promising path toward building large-scale quantum computers. The simple and robust transmon qubit has been the leading platform, achieving multiple milestones. However, fault-tolerant quantum computing calls for qubit operations at error rates significantly lower than those exhibited in the state of the art. Consequently, alternative superconducting qubits with better error protection have attracted increasing interest. Among them, fluxonium is a particularly promising candidate, featuring large anharmonicity and long coherence times. Here, we engineer a fluxonium-based quantum processor that integrates high qubit-coherence, fast frequency-tunability, and individual-qubit addressability for reset, readout, and gates. With simple and fast gate schemes, we achieve an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.97% and a two-qubit gate fidelity of up to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
