Gamma-Ray Bursts: To be Short or Long is not the Question
Lorenzo Amati

TL;DR
This paper questions the reliability of using gamma-ray burst duration alone to determine their progenitors, especially in cases where short bursts are associated with supernovae, challenging existing classification schemes.
Contribution
It critically examines the traditional duration-based classification of gamma-ray bursts and highlights the need for additional criteria to accurately identify their origins.
Findings
Duration alone may not reliably classify gamma-ray bursts.
Short bursts associated with supernovae challenge current models.
Progenitor identification requires more than just burst duration.
Abstract
The association of a short gamma-ray burst with a core-collapse supernova seems to challenge current scenarios for the origin of these extreme events. But how much can we rely on observed duration for pinpointing their progenitors?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
