Estimate of the Background and Sensitivity of theFollow-up X-ray Telescope onboard Einstein Probe
Juan Zhang, Liqiang Qi, Yanji Yang, Juan Wang, Yuan Liu, Weiwei Cui,, Donghua Zhao, Shumie Jia, Tianming Li, Tianxiang Chen, Gang Li, Xiaofan Zhao,, Yong Chen, Huaqiu Liu, Congying Bao, Ju Guan, Liming Song, Weimin Yuan

TL;DR
This paper estimates the in-orbit background and sensitivity of the Follow-up X-ray Telescope on the Einstein Probe using Geant4 simulations, considering various space environment components, and provides sensitivity benchmarks for astrophysical observations.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed simulation-based background estimation and sensitivity analysis for the FXT onboard Einstein Probe, incorporating space environment effects.
Findings
Instrumental background level of ~3.1×10⁻² counts s⁻¹ keV⁻¹ in 0.5-10 keV
Field of view background dominates below 2 keV
Sensitivity can reach a few μCrab in 0.5-2 keV with 25-minute exposure
Abstract
As a space X-ray imaging mission dedicated to time-domain astrophysics, the Einstein Probe (EP) carries two kinds of scientific payloads, the wide-field X-ray telescope (WXT) and the follow-up X-ray telescope (FXT). FXT utilizes Wolter-I type mirrors and the pn-CCD detectors. In this work, we investigate the in-orbit background of FXT based on Geant4 simulation. The impact of various space components present in the EP orbital environment are considered, such as the cosmic photon background, cosmic ray primary and secondary particles (e.g. protons, electrons and positrons), albedo gamma rays, and the low-energy protons near the geomagnetic equator. The obtained instrumental background at 0.5-10 keV, which is mainly induced by cosmic ray protons and cosmic photon background, corresponds to a level of 3.110 counts s keV in the imaging area of the focal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
