What can CMB observations tell us about the neutrino distribution function?

TL;DR

This paper investigates how CMB observations constrain neutrino properties, finding they are sensitive only to neutrino energy densities and not to the detailed distribution function, which affects neutrino mass limits.

Contribution

The study demonstrates that CMB experiments cannot detect features in the neutrino distribution function and provides revised constraints on neutrino energy densities independent of distribution assumptions.

Findings

CMB data constrain neutrino energy densities but not distribution shape.

Neutrino masses up to ~3 eV are compatible with CMB data when distribution uncertainties are considered.

Constraints on neutrino properties are limited to energy densities, affecting mass bounds.

Abstract

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) observations have been used extensively to constrain key properties of neutrinos, such as their mass. However, these inferences are typically dependent on assumptions about the cosmological model, and in particular upon the distribution function of neutrinos in the early Universe. In this paper, we aim to assess the full extent to which CMB experiments are sensitive to the shape of the neutrino distribution. We demonstrate that Planck and CMB-S4-like experiments have no prospects for detecting particular features in the distribution function. Consequently, we take a general approach and marginalise completely over the form of the neutrino distribution to derive constraints on the relativistic and non-relativistic neutrino energy densities, characterised by $N_\mathrm{eff} = 3.0 \pm 0.4$ and $\rho_{\nu,0}^{\rm NR} < 14 \, \mathrm{eV}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}$ at 95% CL, respectively. The fact that these are the only neutrino properties that CMB data can constrain has important implications for neutrino mass limits from cosmology. Specifically, in contrast to the $\Lambda$CDM case where CMB and BAO data tightly constrain the sum of neutrinos masses to be $\sum m_\nu < 0.12 \, \mathrm{eV}$, we explicitly show that neutrino masses as large as $\sum m_\nu \sim 3 \, \mathrm{eV}$ are perfectly consistent with this data. Importantly, for this to be the case, the neutrino number density should be suitably small such that the bound on $\rho_{\nu,0}^\mathrm{NR} = \sum m_\nu n_{\nu,0}$ is still satisfied. We conclude by giving an outlook on the opportunities that may arise from other complementary experimental probes, such as galaxy surveys, neutrino mass experiments and facilities designed to directly detect the cosmic neutrino background.