On the Extraction of Low-energy Constants of Single- and Double-$\beta$ Decays from Lattice QCD: A Sensitivity Analysis
Zohreh Davoudi, Saurabh V. Kadam

TL;DR
This paper assesses how accurately lattice QCD can determine low-energy constants relevant for single- and double-beta decays, highlighting the challenges and potential precision needed for meaningful constraints.
Contribution
It provides a sensitivity analysis of the expected uncertainties in extracting key low-energy constants from future lattice QCD data, focusing on the pionless EFT parameters.
Findings
Achieving small uncertainties in $L_{1,A}$ requires subpercent precision in spectra and matrix elements.
The constant $g_{ u}^{NN}$ is less sensitive and can be constrained with percent-level accuracy.
High-precision lattice calculations are essential for improving constraints on these low-energy constants.
Abstract
Lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) has the promise of constraining low-energy constants (LECs) of nuclear effective field theories (EFTs) from first-principles calculations that incorporate the dynamics of quarks and gluons. Given the Euclidean and finite-volume nature of LQCD outputs, complex mappings are developed in recent years to obtain the Minkowski and infinite-volume counterparts of LQCD observables. In particular, as LQCD is moving toward computing a set of important few-nucleon matrix elements at the physical values of the quark masses, it is important to investigate whether the anticipated precision of LQCD spectra and matrix elements will be sufficient to guarantee tighter constraints on the relevant LECs than those already obtained from phenomenology, considering the non-trivial mappings involved. With a focus on the leading-order LECs of the pionless EFT, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
