Hilbert reciprocity using K-theory localization
Oliver Braunling

TL;DR
This paper develops a novel approach to understanding Hilbert reciprocity in number fields by modifying K-theory boundary maps to include wild ramification effects, except at p=2.
Contribution
It introduces a method to incorporate wild ramification into K-theory boundary maps, extending the scope of Hilbert reciprocity beyond tame cases.
Findings
Successfully visualizes wild symbols as boundary maps in K-theory
Extends Hilbert reciprocity to number fields with wild ramification (except p=2)
Provides a new perspective on ramification effects in algebraic K-theory
Abstract
Usually the boundary map in K-theory localization only gives the tame symbol at . It sees the tamely ramified part of the Hilbert symbol, but no wild ramification. Gillet has shown how to prove Weil reciprocity using such boundary maps. This implies Hilbert reciprocity for curves over finite fields. However, phrasing Hilbert reciprocity for number fields in a similar way fails because it crucially hinges on wild ramification effects. We resolve this issue, except at p=2. Our idea is to pinch singularities near the ramification locus. This fattens up K-theory and makes the wild symbol visible as a boundary map.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
