Upper limits on Einstein's weak equivalence principle placed by uncertainties of dispersion measures of fast radio bursts
Tetsuya Hashimoto, Tomotsugu Goto, Daryl Joe D. Santos, Simon C.-C., Ho, Ece Kilerci-Eser, Tiger Y.-Y. Hsiao, Yi Hang Valerie Wong, Alvina Y. L., On, Seong Jin Kim, Ting-Yi Lu

TL;DR
This paper uses fast radio burst dispersion measure uncertainties to set stringent upper limits on potential violations of Einstein's weak equivalence principle, improving previous astrophysical constraints significantly.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method to constrain WEP violations using FRB dispersion measures, achieving the most stringent limits to date.
Findings
Constraints on $oldsymbol{ riangle ext{gamma}}$ are $oldsymbol{ ext{log} riangle ext{gamma} < -20.8}$ for FRB 121002.
Constraints on $oldsymbol{ ext{log}( riangle ext{gamma}/r_E)}$ are $oldsymbol{<-20.9}$ for FRB 180817.J1533+42.
The results surpass previous astrophysical bounds by about three orders of magnitude.
Abstract
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are astronomical transients with millisecond timescales occurring at cosmological distances. The observed time lag between different energies of each FRB is well described by the inverse-square law of the observed frequency, i.e., dispersion measure. Therefore, FRBs provide one of the ideal laboratories to test Einstein's weak equivalence principle (WEP): the hypothetical time lag between photons with different energies under a gravitational potential. If WEP is violated, such evidence should be exposed within the observational uncertainties of dispersion measures, unless the WEP violation also depends on the inverse-square of the observed frequency. In this work, we constrain the difference of gamma parameters () between photons with different energies using the observational uncertainties of FRB dispersion measures, where for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
