Johnson Coverage Hypothesis: Inapproximability of k-means and k-median in L_p metrics

TL;DR

This paper introduces the Johnson Coverage Hypothesis (JCH) and demonstrates its implications for the hardness of approximating k-median and k-means clustering objectives in $ ext{L}_p$-metrics, significantly improving known inapproximability bounds.

Contribution

The paper proposes the Johnson Coverage Hypothesis (JCH) and connects it with embedding techniques to establish stronger hardness of approximation results for k-median and k-means in $ ext{L}_p$-metrics.

Findings

Hardness of approximation for k-means: 3.94 in $ ext{L}_1$, 1.73 in $ ext{L}_2$ (discrete)

Hardness of approximation for k-means: 2.10 in $ ext{L}_1$, 1.36 in $ ext{L}_2$ (continuous)

Results hold under standard NP≠P assumption, improving previous bounds under UGC.

Abstract

K-median and k-means are the two most popular objectives for clustering algorithms. Despite intensive effort, a good understanding of the approximability of these objectives, particularly in $\ell_p$-metrics, remains a major open problem. In this paper, we significantly improve upon the hardness of approximation factors known in literature for these objectives in $\ell_p$-metrics. We introduce a new hypothesis called the Johnson Coverage Hypothesis (JCH), which roughly asserts that the well-studied max k-coverage problem on set systems is hard to approximate to a factor greater than 1-1/e, even when the membership graph of the set system is a subgraph of the Johnson graph. We then show that together with generalizations of the embedding techniques introduced by Cohen-Addad and Karthik (FOCS '19), JCH implies hardness of approximation results for k-median and k-means in $\ell_p$-metrics for factors which are close to the ones obtained for general metrics. In particular, assuming JCH we show that it is hard to approximate the k-means objective: $\bullet$ Discrete case: To a factor of 3.94 in the $\ell_1$-metric and to a factor of 1.73 in the $\ell_2$-metric; this improves upon the previous factor of 1.56 and 1.17 respectively, obtained under UGC. $\bullet$ Continuous case: To a factor of 2.10 in the $\ell_1$-metric and to a factor of 1.36 in the $\ell_2$-metric; this improves upon the previous factor of 1.07 in the $\ell_2$-metric obtained under UGC. We also obtain similar improvements under JCH for the k-median objective. Additionally, we prove a weak version of JCH using the work of Dinur et al. (SICOMP '05) on Hypergraph Vertex Cover, and recover all the results stated above of Cohen-Addad and Karthik (FOCS '19) to (nearly) the same inapproximability factors but now under the standard NP$\neq$P assumption (instead of UGC).