Learning algorithms versus automatability of Frege systems
J\'an Pich, Rahul Santhanam

TL;DR
This paper establishes an equivalence between provable learning of circuit classes and the automatability of propositional proof systems, linking proof complexity with learning theory under certain conditions.
Contribution
It introduces a framework connecting learning algorithms and proof system automatability, proving their equivalence for strong, well-behaved propositional proof systems.
Findings
Provable learning and automatability are equivalent under certain conditions.
The results apply to systems that simulate Jeřábek's WF system.
Existence of hard functions implies the equivalence for specific proof systems.
Abstract
We connect learning algorithms and algorithms automating proof search in propositional proof systems: for every sufficiently strong, well-behaved propositional proof system , we prove that the following statements are equivalent, 1. Provable learning: proves efficiently that p-size circuits are learnable by subexponential-size circuits over the uniform distribution with membership queries. 2. Provable automatability: proves efficiently that is automatable by non-uniform circuits on propositional formulas expressing p-size circuit lower bounds. Here, is sufficiently strong and well-behaved if I.-III. holds: I. p-simulates Je\v{r}\'abek's system (which strengthens the Extended Frege system by a surjective weak pigeonhole principle); II. satisfies some basic properties of standard proof systems which p-simulate ; III. proves efficiently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
