Improved Characterization of the Astrophysical Muon-Neutrino Flux with 9.5 Years of IceCube Data
R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M., Ahrens, J.M. Alameddine, C. Alispach, A. A. Alves Jr., N. M. Amin, K. Andeen,, T. Anderson, G. Anton, C. Arg\"uelles, Y. Ashida, S. Axani, X. Bai, A., Balagopal V., A. Barbano, S. W. Barwick, B. Bastian, V. Basu

TL;DR
This paper reports an improved measurement of the high-energy astrophysical muon-neutrino flux using 9.5 years of IceCube data, with enhanced sample size and extended model testing, providing more precise spectral parameters and insights into spectral features.
Contribution
The study introduces an improved analysis of IceCube data with a larger event sample and extended model testing, including spectral cutoff and model-independent unfolding, advancing neutrino flux characterization.
Findings
Best-fit power-law spectral index of 2.37
Flux normalization at 100 TeV of 1.44e-18 GeV^{-1}cm^{-2}s^{-1}sr^{-1}
Spectral softening above 1 PeV is statistically favored
Abstract
We present a measurement of the high-energy astrophysical muon-neutrino flux with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. The measurement uses a high-purity selection of ~650k neutrino-induced muon tracks from the Northern celestial hemisphere, corresponding to 9.5 years of experimental data. With respect to previous publications, the measurement is improved by the increased size of the event sample and the extended model testing beyond simple power-law hypotheses. An updated treatment of systematic uncertainties and atmospheric background fluxes has been implemented based on recent models. The best-fit single power-law parameterization for the astrophysical energy spectrum results in a normalization of and a spectral index…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
