Jet energy spectrum and substructure in $e^+e^-$ collisions at 91.2 GeV with ALEPH Archived Data
Yi Chen (1), Anthony Badea (2), Austin Baty (3), Paoti Chang (4),, Yang-Ting Chien (5), Gian Michele Innocenti (6), Marcello Maggi (7),, Christopher McGinn (8), Dennis V. Perepelitsa (8), Michael Peters (1), Tzu-An, Sheng (1), Jesse Thaler (1)

TL;DR
This paper presents the first measurements of jet energy spectra and substructure in $e^+e^-$ collisions at 91.2 GeV using archived ALEPH data, comparing results with QCD calculations and event generators.
Contribution
It provides novel measurements of jet substructure observables in $e^+e^-$ collisions at LEP energies, and evaluates the performance of various event generators against these data.
Findings
Jet energy spectra agree with perturbative QCD calculations.
Event generators do not fully describe the observed data.
Jet substructure observables show discrepancies with models.
Abstract
The first measurements of energy spectra and substructure of anti- jets in hadronic decays in collisions are presented. The archived annihilation data at a center-of-mass energy of 91.2 GeV were collected with the ALEPH detector at LEP in 1994. In addition to inclusive jet and leading dijet energy spectra, various jet substructure observables are analyzed as a function of jet energy which includes groomed and ungroomed jet mass to jet energy ratios, groomed momentum sharing, and groomed jet radius. The results are compared with perturbative QCD calculations and predictions from the SHERPA, HERWIG v7.1.5, PYTHIA 6, PYTHIA 8, and PYQUEN event generators. The jet energy spectra agree with perturbative QCD calculations which include the treatment of logarithms of the jet radius and threshold logarithms. None of the event generators give a fully satisfactory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
