VLA proper motion constraints on the origin, age, and potential magnetar future of PSR J1734$-$3333
C. M. Espinoza, M. Vidal-Navarro, W. C. G. Ho, A. Deller, S., Chatterjee

TL;DR
This study uses VLA observations to measure the proper motion of PSR J1734-3333, constraining its association with nearby supernova remnants, estimating its true age, and exploring its potential evolution into a magnetar.
Contribution
It provides the first proper motion measurement of PSR J1734-3333, rules out association with G354.8-0.8, and suggests the pulsar is older than previously estimated, with implications for its future as a magnetar.
Findings
Proper motion measurement rules out association with G354.8-0.8.
The pulsar's age is likely between 45 and 100 kyr, older than characteristic age.
The pulsar may evolve into a magnetar based on its properties.
Abstract
The characteristic age of PSR J17343333 estimated from its current spin down rate implies that it is a young pulsar ( kyr). But the time derivative of its spin down rate differs markedly from that assumed for normal radio pulsars, meaning its actual age is uncertain. G354.80.8 is a supernova remnant (SNR) whose centre is located 21 arcmin away of the pulsar, and with a morphology that suggests an association with the pulsar. We want to assess the likelihood of the association between PSR J17343333 and G354.80.8 or other nearby supernova remnants quantitatively, with the objective of shedding light on the real age of this pulsar. Observations with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array were carried out in 2015 and 2019 that allow precise astrometric measurements and consequently a proper motion estimate for the pulsar. The proper motion was found to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
