On the number of $e$-folds in the Jordan and Einstein frames
Antonio Racioppi, Martin Vasar

TL;DR
This paper examines how the number of e-folds during inflation varies between Jordan and Einstein frames, highlighting differences in metric and Palatini formulations and proposing a frame-invariant approach.
Contribution
It compares inflationary predictions in Jordan and Einstein frames across metric and Palatini formulations and introduces a frame-invariant method to resolve discrepancies.
Findings
Difference in e-folds is small in metric Jordan frame.
Difference can be significant in Palatini Jordan frame.
Frame-invariant approach can unify predictions.
Abstract
We investigate how inflationary predictions are affected by the difference in the number of -folds between the Jordan and Einstein frames. We study several test models in relation to a Jordan frame defined by the common Higgs-inflation-like non-minimal coupling to gravity and consider two different formulations of gravity: metric and Palatini. We find that the difference is quite contained in case of a metric Jordan frame while can be quite remarkable in case of a Palatini Jordan frame. We also discuss a way to overcome the discrepancy by introducing a frame invariant physical distance and a consequently frame invariant number of -folds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
