Deep neural networks-based denoising models for CT imaging and their efficacy

TL;DR

This paper evaluates various deep neural network models for low-dose CT image denoising, focusing on their ability to preserve subtle image features and texture, beyond traditional metrics like PSNR and SSIM.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of multiple DNN architectures using advanced CT-specific image quality metrics to assess their impact on image resolution, noise texture, and CT number accuracy.

Findings

DNNs improve traditional metrics but vary in preserving subtle features.

Different architectures affect noise texture and resolution differently.

Holistic evaluation reveals strengths and limitations of each model.

Abstract

Most of the Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) based CT image denoising literature shows that DNNs outperform traditional iterative methods in terms of metrics such as the RMSE, the PSNR and the SSIM. In many instances, using the same metrics, the DNN results from low-dose inputs are also shown to be comparable to their high-dose counterparts. However, these metrics do not reveal if the DNN results preserve the visibility of subtle lesions or if they alter the CT image properties such as the noise texture. Accordingly, in this work, we seek to examine the image quality of the DNN results from a holistic viewpoint for low-dose CT image denoising. First, we build a library of advanced DNN denoising architectures. This library is comprised of denoising architectures such as the DnCNN, U-Net, Red-Net, GAN, etc. Next, each network is modeled, as well as trained, such that it yields its best performance in terms of the PSNR and SSIM. As such, data inputs (e.g. training patch-size, reconstruction kernel) and numeric-optimizer inputs (e.g. minibatch size, learning rate, loss function) are accordingly tuned. Finally, outputs from thus trained networks are further subjected to a series of CT bench testing metrics such as the contrast-dependent MTF, the NPS and the HU accuracy. These metrics are employed to perform a more nuanced study of the resolution of the DNN outputs' low-contrast features, their noise textures, and their CT number accuracy to better understand the impact each DNN algorithm has on these underlying attributes of image quality.