Optimal Decremental Connectivity in Non-Sparse Graphs

TL;DR

This paper introduces a randomized algorithm for efficiently maintaining connectivity and 2-edge-connected components in non-sparse graphs under edge deletions, achieving optimal total update time and constant query time.

Contribution

It presents a novel Monte-Carlo randomized reduction from decremental to fully-dynamic edge connectivity, enabling optimal total update time in non-sparse graphs and supporting static problem checks.

Findings

Handles all deletions in linear total time for non-sparse graphs

Supports constant-time connectivity queries

Improves upon previous algorithms with higher time complexity

Abstract

We present a dynamic algorithm for maintaining the connected and 2-edge-connected components in an undirected graph subject to edge deletions. The algorithm is Monte-Carlo randomized and processes any sequence of edge deletions in $O(m + n \operatorname{polylog} n)$ total time. Interspersed with the deletions, it can answer queries to whether any two given vertices currently belong to the same (2-edge-)connected component in constant time. Our result is based on a general Monte-Carlo randomized reduction from decremental $c$-edge-connectivity to a variant of fully-dynamic $c$-edge-connectivity on a sparse graph. While being Monte-Carlo, our reduction supports a certain final self-check that can be used in Las Vegas algorithms for static problems such as Unique Perfect Matching. For non-sparse graphs with $\Omega(n \operatorname{polylog} n)$ edges, our connectivity and $2$-edge-connectivity algorithms handle all deletions in optimal linear total time, using existing algorithms for the respective fully-dynamic problems. This improves upon an $O(m \log (n^2 / m) + n \operatorname{polylog} n)$-time algorithm of Thorup [J.Alg. 1999], which runs in linear time only for graphs with $\Omega(n^2)$ edges. Our constant amortized cost for edge deletions in decremental connectivity in non-sparse graphs should be contrasted with an $\Omega(\log n/\log\log n)$ worst-case time lower bound in the decremental setting [Alstrup, Thore Husfeldt, FOCS'98] as well as an $\Omega(\log n)$ amortized time lower-bound in the fully-dynamic setting [Patrascu and Demaine STOC'04].