TL;DR
This paper proves the hardness of approximating Max-3-LIN problems over non-abelian groups with fixed factor graphs, using advanced algebraic techniques, extending known inapproximability results to more complex group structures.
Contribution
It establishes inapproximability results for Max-3-LIN over non-abelian groups with universal factor graphs, utilizing representation theory and Fourier analysis, and extends these results to specific linear equations.
Findings
Max-3-LIN over non-abelian groups is hard to approximate with fixed factor graphs.
Hardness results hold even for restricted equations of the form x * y * z = g.
Representation theory and Fourier analysis are effective tools in analyzing these problems.
Abstract
Factor graph of an instance of a constraint satisfaction problem with n variables and m constraints is the bipartite graph between [m] and [n] describing which variable appears in which constraints. Thus, an instance of a CSP is completely defined by its factor graph and the list of predicates. We show inapproximability of Max-3-LIN over non-abelian groups (both in the perfect completeness case and in the imperfect completeness case), with the same inapproximability factor as in the general case, even when the factor graph is fixed. Along the way, we also show that these optimal hardness results hold even when we restrict the linear equations in the Max-3-LIN instances to the form x * y * z = g, where x, y, z are the variables and g is a group element. We use representation theory and Fourier analysis over non-abelian groups to analyze the reductions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Max-3-Lin over Non-Abelian Groups with Universal Factor Graphs· youtube
