Non-realizability of some big mapping class groups
Lei Chen, Yan Mary He

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that certain big mapping class groups, including those of surfaces with genus 3 subsurfaces or specific symmetries, cannot be realized as subgroups of the homeomorphism group.
Contribution
It establishes non-realizability results for large classes of mapping class groups, extending understanding of their algebraic and geometric properties.
Findings
Mapping class group of genus 3 subsurface not realizable as homeomorphism subgroup
Certain symmetric surfaces' mapping class groups are not realizable as homeomorphism subgroups
Examples include the plane minus a Cantor set and the sphere minus a Cantor set
Abstract
In this note, we prove that the compactly supported mapping class group of a surface containing a genus subsurface has no realization as a subgroup of the homeomorphism group. We also prove that for certain surfaces with order symmetries, their mapping class groups have no realization as a subgroup of the homeomorphism group. Examples of such surfaces include the plane minus a Cantor set and the sphere minus a Cantor set.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
