A Finite-Sampling, Operational Domain Specific, and Provably Unbiased Connected and Automated Vehicle Safety Metric
Bowen Weng, Linda Capito, Umit Ozguner, Keith Redmill

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new safety metric for connected and automated vehicles that guarantees unbiased safety evaluation within a specific operational domain, based on finite data samples.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel safety metric using $\alpha$-shape and $\epsilon$-robustly forward invariant sets, providing guaranteed unbiased safety assessment for CAVs in finite-sample scenarios.
Findings
Demonstrated effectiveness across diverse driving environments.
Validated in real-world and simulated settings.
Applicable to various road users and vehicle behaviors.
Abstract
A connected and automated vehicle safety metric determines the performance of a subject vehicle (SV) by analyzing the data involving the interactions among the SV and other dynamic road users and environmental features. When the data set contains only a finite set of samples collected from the naturalistic mixed-traffic driving environment, a metric is expected to generalize the safety assessment outcome from the observed finite samples to the unobserved cases by specifying in what domain the SV is expected to be safe and how safe the SV is, statistically, in that domain. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of the existing safety metrics are able to justify the above properties with an operational domain specific, guaranteed complete, and provably unbiased safety evaluation outcome. In this paper, we propose a novel safety metric that involves the -shape and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
