On the validation of pansharpening methods
Gintautas Palubinskas

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges in validating pansharpening methods, compares different validation approaches, and investigates various component substitution and high pass filtering methods on remote sensing data.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of validation issues in pansharpening and evaluates several methods with enhancements on real satellite data.
Findings
Validation approaches often yield inconsistent results.
Component substitution and HPF methods show varying effectiveness.
Enhancements like haze correction and spectral response functions improve performance.
Abstract
Validation of the quality of pansharpening methods is a difficult task because the reference is not directly available. In the meantime, two main approaches have been established: validation in reduced resolution and original resolution. In the former approach it is still not clear how the data are to be processed to a lower resolution. Other open issues are related to the question which resolution and measures should be used. In the latter approach the main problem is how the appropriate measure should be selected. In the most comparison studies the results of both approaches do not correspond, that means in each case other methods are selected as the best ones. Thus, the developers of the new pansharpening methods still stand in the front of dilemma: how to perform a correct or appropriate comparison/evaluation/validation. It should be noted, that the third approach is possible, that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques · Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing in Agriculture
