Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection by Channel-wise Feature Denoising

TL;DR

This paper introduces a channel-wise feature denoising method for fingerprint presentation attack detection, improving robustness, accuracy, and efficiency over existing single-model and multi-model approaches.

Contribution

It proposes a novel CFD-PAD method that suppresses noise channels and enhances discriminative features, outperforming previous methods in accuracy and computational efficiency.

Findings

Achieved 2.53% ACE on LivDet 2017 dataset.

Outperformed best single-model methods in ACE and TDR@FDR=1%.

Reduced computation time by 74.76% compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract

Due to the diversity of attack materials, fingerprint recognition systems (AFRSs) are vulnerable to malicious attacks. It is thus important to propose effective fingerprint presentation attack detection (PAD) methods for the safety and reliability of AFRSs. However, current PAD methods often exhibit poor robustness under new attack types settings. This paper thus proposes a novel channel-wise feature denoising fingerprint PAD (CFD-PAD) method by handling the redundant noise information ignored in previous studies. The proposed method learns important features of fingerprint images by weighing the importance of each channel and identifying discriminative channels and "noise" channels. Then, the propagation of "noise" channels is suppressed in the feature map to reduce interference. Specifically, a PA-Adaptation loss is designed to constrain the feature distribution to make the feature distribution of live fingerprints more aggregate and that of spoof fingerprints more disperse. Experimental results evaluated on the LivDet 2017 dataset showed that the proposed CFD-PAD can achieve a 2.53% average classification error (ACE) and a 93.83% true detection rate when the false detection rate equals 1.0% (TDR@FDR=1%). Also, the proposed method markedly outperforms the best single-model-based methods in terms of ACE (2.53% vs. 4.56%) and TDR@FDR=1%(93.83% vs. 73.32%), which demonstrates its effectiveness. Although we have achieved a comparable result with the state-of-the-art multiple-model-based methods, there still is an increase in TDR@FDR=1% from 91.19% to 93.83%. In addition, the proposed model is simpler, lighter and more efficient and has achieved a 74.76% reduction in computation time compared with the state-of-the-art multiple-model-based method. The source code is available at https://github.com/kongzhecn/cfd-pad.