A Survey on AI Assurance
Feras A. Batarseh, and Laura Freeman

TL;DR
This survey reviews AI assurance research from 1985 to 2021, introducing a new definition, a comparison framework, and a scoring system to evaluate assurance methods, aiming to clarify and guide future developments.
Contribution
It provides a structured overview of AI assurance research, proposing a new definition, a comparative framework, and a scoring system to evaluate existing methods.
Findings
Developed a ten-metric scoring system for AI assurance methods
Contrasted and tabulated various assurance approaches
Provided a roadmap and future directions for AI assurance
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms are increasingly providing decision making and operational support across multiple domains. AI includes a wide library of algorithms for different problems. One important notion for the adoption of AI algorithms into operational decision process is the concept of assurance. The literature on assurance, unfortunately, conceals its outcomes within a tangled landscape of conflicting approaches, driven by contradicting motivations, assumptions, and intuitions. Accordingly, albeit a rising and novel area, this manuscript provides a systematic review of research works that are relevant to AI assurance, between years 1985 - 2021, and aims to provide a structured alternative to the landscape. A new AI assurance definition is adopted and presented and assurance methods are contrasted and tabulated. Additionally, a ten-metric scoring system is developed and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
