Improving cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster number counts with CMB-cluster-lensing data: Results from the SPT-SZ survey and forecasts for the future
P. S. Chaubal, C. L. Reichardt, N. Gupta, B. Ansarinejad, K. Aylor, L., Balkenhol, E. J. Baxter, F. Bianchini, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, S. Bocquet,, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A., Dobbs, W. B. Everett, B. Floyd, E. M. George

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how incorporating CMB-cluster lensing data enhances cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster surveys, notably improving measurements of parameters like sigma_8 and the dark energy equation of state, with forecasts for future surveys.
Contribution
It introduces the use of CMB-cluster lensing measurements to improve cosmological parameter constraints from galaxy cluster data, including forecasts for future surveys.
Findings
Adding CMB-cluster lensing reduces uncertainty in sigma_8 by factors of 2.4 to 3.6.
Combining cluster data with Planck measurements yields sigma_8(Ω_m/0.3)^0.5 = 0.831 ± 0.020.
Future CMB-cluster lensing data can improve constraints on dark energy parameter w by 1.3 times.
Abstract
We show the improvement to cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster surveys with the addition of CMB-cluster lensing data. We explore the cosmological implications of adding mass information from the 3.1 detection of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) by galaxy clusters to the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) selected galaxy cluster sample from the 2500 deg SPT-SZ survey and targeted optical and X-ray followup data. In the CDM model, the combination of the cluster sample with the Planck power spectrum measurements prefers . Adding the cluster data reduces the uncertainty on this quantity by a factor of 1.4, which is unchanged whether or not the 3.1 CMB-cluster lensing measurement is included. We then forecast the impact of CMB-cluster lensing measurements with future cluster…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
