A Topos View of Blockchain Consensus Protocols

TL;DR

This paper reformulates blockchain consensus safety in topos logic, showing that safety properties can be expressed as forcing statements within the internal language of a topos, enabling new logical approaches to protocol correctness.

Contribution

It introduces a topos-theoretic formulation of consensus safety, connecting correctness proofs with internal logic and forcing in topos theory, a novel perspective in blockchain research.

Findings

Safety can be expressed as a forcing statement in topos logic.

Safety properties are viewable as modal statements in topos frameworks.

The formulation applies to arbitrary toposes, broadening theoretical foundations.

Abstract

This paper presents a reformulation in topos logic of a safety result arising in an abstract presentation of blockchain consensus protocols. That is, in a high-level template for "correct-by-construction" consensus protocols, it is shown that a proposition and its negation cannot both be safe in protocol states that have executions to some common state. This is in fact true for any inconsistent propositions and the proof requires only intuitionistic reasoning. This opens the door for work on consensus protocols in the internal language of a topos. As a first pass on such a program, the main contribution of this paper is the formulation of estimate safety in abstract correct-by-construction protocols as a forcing statement in the internal logic of a given topos. This is illustrated first in the setting of copresheaf toposes. It is also seen there that safety can be viewed as a modal statement. For these interpretations, some extensions and adaptations of results in the literature on modal operators in toposes are presented. The final reformulation of estimate safety is a completely elementary version in the language of an arbitrary topos where it is seen that estimate safety is equivalent to a certain forcing statement.