When can we reconstruct the ancestral state? A unified theory
Lam Si Tung Ho, Vu Dinh

TL;DR
This paper develops a unified theoretical framework for understanding when ancestral state reconstruction is reliably possible across different evolutionary models, linking discrete and continuous trait analyses.
Contribution
It establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for consistent ancestral state reconstruction across multiple models, unifying previous disparate results.
Findings
Conditions are equivalent for nested trees with bounded heights across models.
Counter-example shows equivalence breaks down with unbounded tree heights.
Provides a comprehensive theoretical foundation for ancestral state reconstruction.
Abstract
Ancestral state reconstruction is one of the most important tasks in evolutionary biology. Conditions under which we can reliably reconstruct the ancestral state have been studied for both discrete and continuous traits. However, the connection between these results is unclear, and it seems that each model needs different conditions. In this work, we provide a unifying theory on the consistency of ancestral state reconstruction for various types of trait evolution models. Notably, we show that for a sequence of nested trees with bounded heights, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a consistent ancestral state reconstruction method under discrete models, the Brownian motion model, and the threshold model are equivalent. When tree heights are unbounded, we provide a simple counter-example to show that this equivalence is no longer valid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Genetic diversity and population structure
