An Assessment of the Eye Tracking Signal Quality Captured in the HoloLens 2
Samantha D. Aziz, Oleg V. Komogortsev

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the eye tracking signal quality of the HoloLens 2, revealing calibration issues and demonstrating that recalibration significantly improves spatial accuracy and overall signal quality.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of HoloLens 2's eye tracking signal quality and shows that recalibration enhances measurement accuracy.
Findings
Uncalibrated data shows reduced spatial accuracy.
Recalibration improves signal quality significantly.
Dataset collected from 30 healthy adults.
Abstract
We present an analysis of the eye tracking signal quality of the HoloLens 2s integrated eye tracker. Signal quality was measured from eye movement data captured during a random saccades task from a new eye movement dataset collected on 30 healthy adults. We characterize the eye tracking signal quality of the device in terms of spatial accuracy, spatial precision, temporal precision, linearity, and crosstalk. Most notably, our evaluation of spatial accuracy reveals that the eye movement data in our dataset appears to be uncalibrated. Recalibrating the data using a subset of our dataset task produces notably better eye tracking signal quality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
