Non-Standard Choice in Matching Markets
Gian Caspari, Manshu Khanna

TL;DR
This paper investigates how matching mechanisms can be designed to handle non-standard choice behaviors, establishing conditions for stability and incentive compatibility, and demonstrating practical modifications to existing mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides necessary and sufficient conditions for stable, incentive-compatible matching mechanisms accommodating non-standard choices, and shows practical modifications to existing mechanisms.
Findings
Matching mechanisms can be adapted for non-standard choice behaviors.
Conditions for stability and incentive compatibility are characterized.
A simple modification enables common mechanisms to handle non-standard choices.
Abstract
We explore the possibility of designing matching mechanisms that can accommodate non-standard choice behavior. We pin down the necessary and sufficient conditions on participants' choice behavior for the existence of stable and incentive compatible mechanisms. Our results imply that well-functioning matching markets can be designed to adequately accommodate a plethora of choice behaviors, including the standard behavior consistent with preference maximization. To illustrate the significance of our results in practice, we show that a simple modification in a commonly used matching mechanism enables it to accommodate non-standard choice behavior.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Auction Theory and Applications
