Implicit vs Unfolded Graph Neural Networks
Yongyi Yang, Tang Liu, Yangkun Wang, Zengfeng Huang, David Wipf

TL;DR
This paper compares implicit and unfolded graph neural networks, analyzing their theoretical differences and empirical performance, highlighting their respective strengths in efficiency, interpretability, and accuracy across various graph scenarios.
Contribution
It provides a detailed theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of IGNN and UGNN, revealing their equivalences, divergences, and practical advantages in different graph learning contexts.
Findings
IGNN is more memory-efficient.
UGNN supports integrated attention mechanisms.
Both models perform well under different graph conditions.
Abstract
It has been observed that message-passing graph neural networks (GNN) sometimes struggle to maintain a healthy balance between the efficient/scalable modeling of long-range dependencies across nodes while avoiding unintended consequences such oversmoothed node representations, sensitivity to spurious edges, or inadequate model interpretability. To address these and other issues, two separate strategies have recently been proposed, namely implicit and unfolded GNNs (that we abbreviate to IGNN and UGNN respectively). The former treats node representations as the fixed points of a deep equilibrium model that can efficiently facilitate arbitrary implicit propagation across the graph with a fixed memory footprint. In contrast, the latter involves treating graph propagation as unfolded descent iterations as applied to some graph-regularized energy function. While motivated differently, in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Age of Information Optimization
