Type II supernovae from the Carnegie Supernova Project-I. II. Physical parameter distributions from hydrodynamical modelling

TL;DR

This study uses hydrodynamical modelling of a large sample of Type II supernovae to derive progenitor properties, revealing insights into their mass distribution and challenging existing stellar evolution models.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive distribution of progenitor parameters for SNe II using a large, homogeneously observed dataset and advanced hydrodynamical modelling techniques.

Findings

Ejecta masses mostly 8-10 solar masses

Explosion energies range from 0.15 to 1.40 foe

Progenitor mass distribution is steeper than Salpeter IMF

Abstract

Linking supernovae to their progenitors is a powerful method for furthering our understanding of the physical origin of their observed differences, while at the same time testing stellar evolution theory. In this second study of a series of three papers where we characterise SNe II to understand their diversity, we derive progenitor properties (initial and ejecta masses, and radius), explosion energy, $^{56}$Ni mass, and its degree of mixing within the ejecta for a large sample of SNe II. This dataset was obtained by the Carnegie Supernova Project-I and is characterised by a high cadence of their optical and NIR light curves and optical spectra that were homogeneously observed and processed. A large grid of hydrodynamical models and a fitting procedure based on MCMC methods were used to fit the bolometric light curve and the evolution of the photospheric velocity of 53 SNe II. We infer ejecta masses between 7.9 and 14.8 $M_{\odot}$, explosion energies between 0.15 and 1.40 foe, and $^{56}$Ni masses between 0.006 and 0.069 $M_{\odot}$. We define a subset of 24~SNe (the `gold sample') with well-sampled bolometric light curves and expansion velocities for which we consider the results more robust. Most SNe~II in the gold sample ($\sim$88%) are found with ejecta masses in the range of $\sim$8-10 $M_{\odot}$, coming from low zero-age main-sequence masses (9-12 $M_{\odot}$). The modelling of the initial-mass distribution of the gold sample gives an upper mass limit of 21.3$^{+3.8}_{-0.4}$ $M_{\odot}$ and a much steeper distribution than that for a Salpeter massive-star IMF. This IMF incompatibility is due to the large number of low-mass progenitors found -- when assuming standard stellar evolution. This may imply that high-mass progenitors lose more mass during their lives than predicted. However, a deeper analysis of all stellar evolution assumptions is required to test this hypothesis.