Analysis of the Breakthrough Listen signal of interest blc1 with a technosignature verification framework
Sofia Z. Sheikh, Shane Smith, Danny C. Price, David DeBoer, Brian C., Lacki, Daniel J. Czech, Steve Croft, Vishal Gajjar, Howard Isaacson, Matt, Lebofsky, David H. E. MacMahon, Cherry Ng, Karen I. Perez, Andrew P. V., Siemion, Claire Isabel Webb, Andrew Zic, Jamie Drew

TL;DR
This paper presents a framework for analyzing potential technosignatures in SETI data, applied to a candidate signal from Proxima Centauri, ultimately identifying it as human-made interference rather than extraterrestrial in origin.
Contribution
The paper introduces a systematic procedure for verifying technosignatures, demonstrating its effectiveness by correctly classifying a candidate signal as interference.
Findings
The signal 'blc1' was identified as an intermodulation product of local interference.
Multiple similar interference signals were found at harmonic frequencies.
The framework emphasizes the importance of detailed follow-up for candidate signals.
Abstract
The aim of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) is to find technologically-capable life beyond Earth through their technosignatures. On 2019 April 29, the Breakthrough Listen SETI project observed Proxima Centauri with the Parkes 'Murriyang' radio telescope. These data contained a narrowband signal with characteristics broadly consistent with a technosignature near 982 MHz ('blc1'). Here we present a procedure for the analysis of potential technosignatures, in the context of the ubiquity of human-generated radio interference, which we apply to blc1. Using this procedure, we find that blc1 is not an extraterrestrial technosignature, but rather an electronically-drifting intermodulation product of local, time-varying interferers aligned with the observing cadence. We find dozens of instances of radio interference with similar morphologies to blc1 at frequencies harmonically…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
