Two regimes of confinement in photonic nanocavities: bulk confinement versus lightning rods
Marcus Albrechtsen, Babak Vosoughi Lahijani, and S{\o}ren Stobbe

TL;DR
This paper theoretically distinguishes two confinement regimes in dielectric bowtie nanocavities: bulk dielectric confinement and a lightning-rod effect at sharp corners, impacting mode volume and light-matter interaction.
Contribution
It identifies and characterizes two distinct confinement regimes in photonic nanocavities, clarifying the role of lightning-rod effects versus bulk confinement.
Findings
Bulk confinement resembles conventional nanocavities.
Lightning-rod effect causes local field enhancement at corners.
Mode volume can be minimized without bulk field enhancement.
Abstract
We present a theoretical study of dielectric bowtie cavities and show that they are governed by two essentially different confinement regimes. The first is confinement inside the bulk dielectric and the second is a local lightning-rod regime where the field is locally enhanced at sharp corners and may yield a vanishing mode volume without necessarily enhancing the mode inside the bulk dielectric. We show that while the bulk regime is reminiscent of the confinement in conventional nanocavities, the most commonly used definition of the mode volume gauges in fact the lightning-rod effect when applied to ultra-compact cavities, such as bowties. Distinguishing between these two regimes will be crucial for future research on nanocavities, and our insights show how to obtain strongly enhanced light-matter interaction over large bandwidths.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMechanical and Optical Resonators · Photonic and Optical Devices · Quantum Information and Cryptography
