Critical Sentence Identification in Legal Cases Using Multi-Class Classification
Sahan Jayasinghe, Lakith Rambukkanage, Ashan Silva, Nisansa de Silva,, Amal Shehan Perera

TL;DR
This paper proposes a multi-class classification approach using sentence embeddings and a custom loss function to identify critical sentences in legal cases, aiding legal professionals in analyzing case texts more efficiently.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of sentence embeddings with a task-specific loss function for critical sentence identification in legal texts.
Findings
Improved accuracy over baseline models
Effective identification of critical sentences in legal cases
Demonstrated potential for legal NLP applications
Abstract
Inherently, the legal domain contains a vast amount of data in text format. Therefore it requires the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) to cater to the analytically demanding needs of the domain. The advancement of NLP is spreading through various domains, such as the legal domain, in forms of practical applications and academic research. Identifying critical sentences, facts and arguments in a legal case is a tedious task for legal professionals. In this research we explore the usage of sentence embeddings for multi-class classification to identify critical sentences in a legal case, in the perspective of the main parties present in the case. In addition, a task-specific loss function is defined in order to improve the accuracy restricted by the straightforward use of categorical cross entropy loss.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
