Comparison of Gaia and Hipparcos parallaxes of close visual binary stars and the impact on determinations of their masses
Mashhoor Ahmad Al-Wardat, Abdallah M. Hussein, Hamid M. Al-Naimiy and, Martin A. Barstow

TL;DR
This study compares Gaia DR2 and Hipparcos parallaxes for close visual binary stars, demonstrating Gaia's superior accuracy and its implications for stellar mass determinations.
Contribution
The paper provides a recalculation of binary star masses using Gaia DR2 data and compares it with previous Hipparcos-based results, highlighting Gaia's improved precision.
Findings
Gaia DR2 parallaxes are significantly more accurate than Hipparcos.
Recalculated binary star masses using Gaia data show improved reliability.
Gaia data enhances understanding of stellar parameters in binary systems.
Abstract
Precise measurement of the fundamental parameters of stellar systems, including mass and radius, depends critically on how well the stellar distances are known. Astrometry from space provides parallax measurements of unprecented accuracy, from which distances can be derived, initially from the Hipparcos mission, with further refinement of that analysis provided by van Leeuwen in 2007. The publication of the Gaia DR2 catalogue promises a dramatic improvement in the available data. We have recalculated the dynamical masses of a sample of 1 700 close visual binary stars using Gaia DR2 and compared the results with masses derived from both the original and enhanced Hipparcos data. We show the van Leeuwen analysis yields results close to those of Gaia DR2, but the latter are significantly more accurate. We consider the impact of the Gaia DR2 parallaxes on our understanding of the sample of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
