Community detection using low-dimensional network embedding algorithms

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of network embedding algorithms DeepWalk and node2vec in community detection within large, sparse networks, providing theoretical guarantees and conditions for successful recovery.

Contribution

It offers a rigorous theoretical comparison of DeepWalk and node2vec, revealing conditions under which each algorithm can successfully recover communities in sparse networks.

Findings

node2vec outperforms DeepWalk in sparser networks

Random walk length affects community recovery success

Algorithms may fail in very sparse settings

Abstract

With the increasing relevance of large networks in important areas such as the study of contact networks for spread of disease, or social networks for their impact on geopolitics, it has become necessary to study machine learning tools that are scalable to very large networks, often containing millions of nodes. One major class of such scalable algorithms is known as network representation learning or network embedding. These algorithms try to learn representations of network functionals (e.g.~nodes) by first running multiple random walks and then using the number of co-occurrences of each pair of nodes in observed random walk segments to obtain a low-dimensional representation of nodes on some Euclidean space. The aim of this paper is to rigorously understand the performance of two major algorithms, DeepWalk and node2vec, in recovering communities for canonical network models with ground truth communities. Depending on the sparsity of the graph, we find the length of the random walk segments required such that the corresponding observed co-occurrence window is able to perform almost exact recovery of the underlying community assignments. We prove that, given some fixed co-occurrence window, node2vec using random walks with a low non-backtracking probability can succeed for much sparser networks compared to DeepWalk using simple random walks. Moreover, if the sparsity parameter is low, we provide evidence that these algorithms might not succeed in almost exact recovery. The analysis requires developing general tools for path counting on random networks having an underlying low-rank structure, which are of independent interest.