Comment on `Parameter-dependent unitary transformation approach for quantum Rabi model'
Daniel Braak, Murray T. Batchelor, Qing-Hu Chen

TL;DR
This paper critically examines and refutes a recent claimed exact solution to the quantum Rabi model, identifying it as an approximation rather than an exact solution due to fundamental errors.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of the previous solution, clarifying the correct approach and highlighting the importance of proper term inclusion in the quantum Rabi model.
Findings
The previous solution is an approximation, not an exact solution.
Neglecting certain terms leads to a simplified model akin to Jaynes-Cummings.
The correct solution requires careful treatment of all Hamiltonian terms.
Abstract
We discuss the elementary errors in D.G. Zhang's [New. J. Phys. 23, 093014 (2021)] claimed exact solution of the quantum Rabi model. The erroneous solution is seen to be nothing more than the combined solution of the simpler Jaynes-Cummings and anti-Jaynes-Cummings models obtained by neglecting terms in the model Hamiltonian.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography
