Completeness of the Gaia-verse V: Astrometry and Radial Velocity sample selection functions in Gaia EDR3
Andrew Everall, Douglas Boubert

TL;DR
This paper provides empirically derived selection functions for Gaia EDR3, enabling correction for observational biases in scientific analyses involving astrometry and radial velocities.
Contribution
It introduces detailed selection functions for Gaia EDR3 sources based on magnitude, position, and color, facilitating bias correction in research.
Findings
Selection functions depend non-trivially on observable parameters.
Empirical estimation highlights the importance of correcting for selection biases.
Accessible via GitHub for community use.
Abstract
We risk reaching false scientific conclusions if we test our physical theories against subsets of the Gaia catalogue without correcting for the biased process by which stars make it into our sample. In this paper we produce selection functions for three Gaia science samples to enable the community to correct for this bias. We estimate the probability that a source in Gaia EDR3 will have i) a reported parallax and proper motion, ii) an astrometric renormalised unit weight error below 1.4, or iii) a reported radial velocity. These selection functions are estimated as a function of -band apparent magnitude and position on the sky, with the latter two also being dependent on colour. The inferred selection functions have a non-trivial dependence on these observable parameters, demonstrating the importance of empirically estimating selection functions. We also produce a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
